Blog
Who gave them permission to block the sun?
Apr
He plays God with the sun: a dangerous story to darken the sky
The United Kingdom is preparing to conduct experiments in “solar radiation management”, a fanciful way of saying that it plans to darken sunlight that reaches the ground. Usually, ads of this nature by rule are only the admission that such activities have been going on for some time.
Now this raises serious fears, starting with the most basic: consent. No public voting took place anywhere in the world. Universal public awareness or information campaign did not start. Does anyone here in the USA asks if you want to be sprayed with heavy metals or anything else, is part of these geoengineering experiments?
People in Great Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia and outside of them were not asked if they agreed to it. Without conscious consent, these “experiments” seem more like a top -down decision made by the elites than a democratic scientific effort. Sounds very much like a great experiment with Covid, right?
Sunlight: Life foundation
Look, sunlight is not only nice; This is absolutely necessary for life. Plants use sunlight through photosynthesis for food production and oxygen release. If we reduce sunlight, we absolutely reduce photosynthesis.
Less photosynthesis means less food, more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and less oxygen for people and animals. In short, manipulation of sunlight with a full spectrum of injuries will damage food supply and fundamental life processes at all levels.
Photosynthesis naturally removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Ironically, the target of the sun combination is to fight global warming by limiting sunlight, but if photosynthesis dismisses, larger carbon dioxide will remain in the atmosphere … doing the exact opposite of what these experiments intend.
Food control is people control
Who will control the remaining food when food production falls due to less sunlight? This loss of control over our food supply is not just a theoretical problem. Historically, controlling food inventory has always meant controlling the population. More information on how the elites historically controlled societies from above … Read the Republic of Plato. This is not new.
In addition, in ancient sieges, the armies surrounded the cities and starved them to surrender. The idea that global elites or governments can affect food production by controlling sunlight is not just a disturbing plot of science fiction … It is real concern that we cannot ignore.
Risk of global weather and stability
The risk of politicians manipulating sunlight goes far beyond local gardens or vitamin D. Changing how much sunlight reaches different parts of the Earth can disturb significant weather patterns, such as Asian Monsuny, which feed billions of people.
If the monsunas are changed or failures, it can cause mass hunger, migration and even global wars over food and water. The perspective of such conflicts should cause a serious problem. Do we have any long -term research on these Shenanigans?
A delicate ecosystem at risk
Each small change can cause wave effects known as “butterfly effects”, in which one small change leads to massive unexpected consequences. Even the sun and we could free the chaotic, uncontrolled weather changes, biological diversity and the balance of life itself.
Our natural ecosystem is a masterpiece of unimaginable complexity. Plants, animals, fungi, bacteria and viruses form a delicate network of life, all sun -powered in a full spectrum.
Each small change can cause wave effects known as “butterfly effects”, in which one small change leads to massive unexpected consequences. Even the sun and we could free the chaotic, uncontrolled weather changes, biological diversity and the balance of life itself.
The potential of such chaos should cause serious care.
Biological diversity and human health threatened
Reduced sunlight would probably reduce biological diversity. Human activity has already caused the loss of many species, and the loss of even more future discoveries, drugs and food sources. Sunlight also plays a key role in human health, including in the production of vitamin D, and even mood regulation.
Reduction of sunlight can worsen the common problem of vitamin D deficiency and increase the seasonal depression index, dementia, pain due to inflammation, and even hair loss. Sunlight ultraviolet rays naturally disinfect the environment, helping to control harmful bacteria and viruses. Less sun can mean a greater disease.
Who decides?
One of the most disturbing parts of this project is the issue of making decisions. Who authorized such huge experiments in the environment? This is already happening in the United States, we all know it. Just look up.
In Great Britain, an advanced agency and remuneration, which is part of the government, finances these “high risk” research.
Key characters such as Patrick Vallance, A former government advisor is involved during Covid blockades, and now the Minister of Science. Considering past “errors” and lack of responsibility in large scientific projects conducted by the government, many citizens are unable to trust these leaders with something as critical as sunlight.
You also need to ask yourself if Great Britain gets too much sun? I looked at the number of sunlight in Great Britain and several other places and found this: comparison of the average annual hours of sun in Great Britain with other regions around the world:
- Great Britain (Great Britain): About 1500 hours a year.
- Northern Europe (e.g. Norway, Sweden): Similar or slightly smaller than Great Britain, with about 1400-1 800 hours a year.
- South Europe (e.g. Spain, Italy): Much more sun, with about 2,500-3,000 hours a year.
- North America (e.g. United States, Canada): Varies significantly depending on the region. For example:
- Yuma, Arizona: over 4,000 hours a year (one of the most sunny places on Earth).
- Seattle, Washington: about 2300 hours a year.
- New York: about 2500 hours a year.
- South America (e.g. Brazil, Argentina): Also differs very much. For example:
- Sao Paulo, Brazil: about 2,200 hours a year.
- Buenos Aires, Argentina: about 2000 hours a year.
- Africa (e.g. Egypt, South African Republic): Generally very sunny. For example:
- Aswan, Egypt: over 3800 hours a year.
- Cape Town, South African Republic: about 3100 hours a year.
- Asia (e.g. India, Japan): It differs very much. For example:
- New Delhi, India: about 2800 hours a year.
- Tokyo, Japan: about 1800 hours a year.
- Australia: Generally very sunny. For example:
- Perth: about 3200 hours a year.
- Sydney: about 2600 hours a year.
- Equatorial regions (e.g. Ekwador, Kenya): Very sunny, with one of the highest hours of sun in the world. For example:
- Quito, Ecuador: about 2000 hours a year (although it may seem much more sunny due to the intensity of the sun).
- Nairobi, Kenya: about 2500 hours a year.
These comparisons emphasize that the United Kingdom receives a small amount of sun compared to other regions of the world, with most regions receive many more hours of sun per year.
So … Does Great Britain (Great Britain) do too much sun? You decide.
Simple, safer solutions
If reducing carbon dioxide is really a goal, there are simpler and safer methods. Plant more trees. Encourage natural agriculture and afforestation.
Restore sea plankton populations that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. Instead of technologically advanced experiments with unverified and unpredictable results, why not work with nature and not against it?
Let’s wake up and look up
The most important thing is that ecosystems … and the human body … are too complex for us to fully understand. Action with political and elite arrogance … assuming that we can control nature without consequences, never ended well.
Instead of accusing dangerous experiments, governments around the world must be forced by voters to be humble, respect the world of nature, and above all … prioritizing the consent and security of their citizens. Think about your children and grandchildren.
The future of life on earth depends on the sunlight full of spectrum.
